Search

COVID-19: The Revelations Will Not Be Televised

Updated: Apr 30

Media turning a blind eye as pandemic narrative crumbles.

The pandemic pantomime appears to be ending, but the show is far from over. Those once ostracised for their pursuit of truth are being vindicated by recent revelations seeping into the public domain, albeit under the mainstream radar.

In the last few months, we’ve seen reports confirming that lockdowns failed to save any lives from Covid – unsurprisingly, this was only picked up by a few news outlets in England. A recent inquiry also confirmed Sweden’s decision not to impose a lockdown was the right one as those countries who did went on to experience worse outcomes. For instance, most of the Covid-labelled deaths in England occurred under the veil of lockdowns. The impact of the lockdowns led internationally renowned epidemiologist Jay Bhattacharya to declare them the 'single biggest public health mistake in history'. The collateral damage from these measures will be felt for years to come.

The UK government were able to impose these societal restrictions through control of the media and the use of ‘hard-hitting emotional messaging’ to exaggerate the threat from Covid-19. A group of psychologists have since declared the methods used to scare the public into compliance as ‘grossly unethical’. Media outlets challenging the mainstream narrative have been censored and lambasted for spreading dangerous misinformation. The recent furore regarding guests on Joe Rogan’s popular podcast have amplified this issue, with guest Maajid Nawaz exposing the use of ‘military-grade psyops’ via the deployment of 77 Brigade operatives on social media.

The highly controversial use of face coverings has come under the spotlight with a recent study showing they do ‘little if anything’ to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The flawed PCR tests have been questioned again as they are unable to ascertain infectivity and may mistake colds and flu for coronavirus. Since mid-June 2021, NHS England have been publishing data on the proportion of Covid inpatients being treated primarily for Covid-19 and during the height of Omicron this dropped to less than 50%. The Office for National Statistics recently released data on the number of deaths from Covid alone and the figures were barely 10% of the overall total.

One may conclude that the threat from Covid-19 has been exaggerated from the beginning. Though if we trace back to the early Downing Street press conferences, we were told that Covid-19 was a ‘mild disease’ from which most will speedily recover. No wonder Downing Street had few qualms about hosting parties during the first lockdown – they just chose not to publicise this fact until 18 months later.

Some of the more alarming facts about the impact of the COVID-19 response remain buried in government reports and anecdotes from whistle-blowers. The recently published list of adverse vaccine events seems to have conveniently coincided with blanket media coverage of other global events deemed more newsworthy. Clips of MP Christopher Chope discussing the scale of the ‘vaccine nightmare’ have since been removed by YouTube. Despite this, the vaccine roll-out continues with 5-11 year olds next in line for the jab, even though it could take 2 million vaccinations to prevent just 1 ICU admission in well children from this age group. Would people still rush to roll up their sleeves if they understood the difference between the publicised 95% relative risk reduction and the 1% absolute risk reduction from the Pfizer trial, the integrity of which has been brought into question by a whistle-blower exposé in the British Medical Journal. Claims that the vaccine has saved over 100,000 lives seem wildly inaccurate given that more people died with COVID-19 in England during 2021 than in 2020.

Despite the media focus on the Wuhan lab-leak theory, one alternative explanation around the origins of the virus remains conspicuously absent from reporting. Don’t expect any mainstream media outlet to highlight the fact that over 170 Freedom of Information requests from health institutions in 25 countries, including Public Health England, have failed to show proof of the existence of SARS-CoV-2 or that is causes COVID-19. At the beginning of the pandemic, we were told that excess deaths are the true measure of its impact. However, most commentators failed to notice that we were observing negative excess deaths before the first lockdown commenced. It is perhaps no coincidence that following the discharge of 40,000 inpatients by the NHS there were 40,000 excess out-of-hospital deaths during the first wave.

While the Covid-19 narrative has begun to eat itself, the media focus has rapidly shifted to the latest moral panic intended to consume the attention of the masses. Although we can expect little from the recently announced Covid inquiry, the truth will always come to light.


This article was also published in April 2022 edition of The Light paper.


38 views0 comments